Meet the 2018 Candidates: Scott Kirycki

The 2018 elections for Electronic Records Section leadership are upon us! To support your getting to know the candidates, we will be presenting additional information provided by the 2018 nominees for ERS leadership positions. For more information about the slate of candidates, you can check out the full 2018 ERS elections site. ERS Members: be sure to vote! Polls are open through July 17!

Candidate name: Scott Kirycki

Running for: Steering Committee

What made you decide you wanted to become an archivist?

My journey to becoming an archivist began somewhere that did not, strictly speaking, exist: the fictional worlds of radio programs from the 1940s. When I was a boy, a local radio station replayed old shows such as The Lone Ranger, The Shadow, and The Jack Benny Program. The shows pulled me in with their appeal to the imagination, and I wanted to learn more about them. My parents and teachers had taught me well about the library, and my interest in radio programs (and soon my interest in the historical period that produced them) provided a new focus for the use of library resources. I checked out books, records, and tapes and studied the non-circulating reference material. Later, as I worked on more research projects for school assignments, I learned how to use The Reader’s Guide to Periodical Literature, and that led me to the treasures contained in bound volumes of magazines and on microfilm.

After starting college and choosing English as my major, I spent more time in libraries, particularly academic libraries with their special collections and emphasis on research. I grew to enjoy the research part of college work especially, which prompted me to pursue a master’s in English literature. When the time came for me to do a thesis for my degree, I picked a bibliographic research project over a literary interpretation or analysis. I created an annotated bibliography of the books advertised in The Tatler, an eighteenth-century British periodical.

Given my interest in research and the amount of time I spent in libraries, I considered following my master’s in English with a degree in library science. Since I liked historical material, I thought of studying to work in an archive. Although I looked into applying at some schools of library science, I was not wholeheartedly enthusiastic about additional years of schooling at that point in my life, so my journey took a turn to the business world.

The company where I began working after grad school turned out to be a good fit for me. The work connected to my interest in research because it involved making computerized databases for lawyers. I learned about database software, indexing, document scanning, and some electronic records management. In time, I became a department manager and later moved to project management. Regrettably for me, the company was eventually sold, and the new owners started a course of restructuring that culminated with the elimination of my position.

After exploring the job market, I reached the conclusion that further education would be a rewarding pursuit – rewarding not just from the standpoint of increasing the likelihood of landing a job, but also rewarding for personal growth and the opportunity to learn from other people. Because I had considered library science before and still had an interest in the things of the past, I decided to return to school to earn a degree in library science with a focus on archives. I was drawn to courses on digital content where I could continue to use and build on the experience and data-handling skills that I gained during my first career.

Though my decision to become an archivist was a long time coming, I am glad to have made it and look forward to continuing to discover the rewards of working in a field where I can benefit others by helping them connect to information.

What is one thing you’d like to see the Electronic Records Section accomplish during your time on the steering committee?

As I have been working on projects with the Records Management Team at the University of Notre Dame, I have become increasingly aware of how many electronic records consist of data points in enterprise-size content management systems rather than discrete files such as Word docs and PDFs. I anticipate that archiving databases as well as material from systems that were not necessarily designed with long-term preservation in mind will be a growing challenge for archivists. I would like to see the Electronic Records Section put forward guidance on best practices for meeting this challenge.

What cartoon character do you model yourself after?

The Tick (from the 1994 – 1996 Fox animated series)

Meet the 2018 Candidates: Kelsey O’Connell

The 2018 elections for Electronic Records Section leadership are upon us! To support your getting to know the candidates, we will be presenting additional information provided by the 2018 nominees for ERS leadership positions. For more information about the slate of candidates, you can check out the full 2018 ERS elections site. ERS Members: be sure to vote! Polls are open through July 17!

Candidate name: Kelsey O’Connell

Running for: Steering Committee

What made you decide you wanted to become an archivist?

As a history/English major in college, I knew I didn’t want to become a teacher or a lawyer so I began exploring other career options. I landed a position as a student assistant in my college library’s Special Collections and Archives department where I began processing collections. I immediately loved the organization, research, and learning that I participated in daily and realized I just wanted to do this for the rest of my life.

What is one thing you’d like to see the Electronic Records Section accomplish during your time on the steering committee?

My primary interest is employing ERS’s platform to influence SAA and related organizations to begin creating and formalizing documentation for electronic records. We all talk about documentation a lot, but we still haven’t rolled them out. I think a strategic approach to initiating much of this documentation is for ERS to survey, index, and prioritize various policies, guidelines, standards, and frameworks needed to have robust documentation on the management and care of electronic records. We’d be able to utilize Section members’ input and participation in the discussion, allowing us to have a comprehensive yet diverse perspective for our recommendations.

What cartoon character do you model yourself after?

I have to admit I had to ask my family and friends for help identifying this one. More than a few of them said Velma from Scooby Doo. I laughed because I assumed it was because I really can’t see without my glasses – like when my cat enjoys knocking them off my nightstand in the middle of the night and I have to search for them in the morning. But they all said it’s because I like figuring stuff out. Although mystery isn’t my favorite genre, there are some clear parallels to researching and employing some trial and error tactics with electronic records.

Meet the 2018 Candidates: Jane Kelly

The 2018 elections for Electronic Records Section leadership are upon us! To support your getting to know the candidates, we will be presenting additional information provided by the 2018 nominees for ERS leadership positions. For more information about the slate of candidates, you can check out the full 2018 ERS elections site. ERS Members: be sure to vote! Polls are open through July 17!

Candidate name: Jane Kelly

Running for: Steering Committee

What made you decide you wanted to become an archivist?

My first contact with archives was as a college intern. The position was unpaid, required an expensive ninety minute commute each way, and wasn’t exactly thrilling. I spent most of that job with my headphones in, dusting red rot off of books, waiting to go home. This was not my dream job. It wasn’t until several years after I finished college that I found myself truly engaged with archives as a career path. I studied history as an undergrad but chose not to pursue a PhD, so I was happy to find myself in a job where understanding the past really matters. I began to appreciate the ways in which archives and archivists construct narratives of the past in their everyday work. For better or worse, there’s a lot of power in what we do. More importantly, it was the people I worked with who made me want to become an archivist. Having coworkers who took the time to teach me on the job, especially before I started grad school, has been invaluable. Working with people who encouraged me to attend conferences, grapple with big questions, and take on responsibility made me want to keep working and learning. Without that, I’m not sure that I would have stuck around.

What is one thing you’d like to see the Electronic Records Section accomplish during your time on the steering committee?

I would love to see the Electronic Records Section become an even greater resource for other SAA sections. It seems inevitable that everyone who works in archives will need to understand electronic records and born-digital material, at least at a basic level. ERS seems like the obvious hub for those resources. I want other archivists to see that they are capable of understanding issues unique to electronic records and that they don’t need to be intimidated by this part of the field. As a young professional, I’m also particularly interested in partnering with SNAP. Access to mentorship has been really important for me, both in terms of choosing to stay in the archives profession and learning how to do the work. I would like to see deeper connections between these two groups and find ways to support folks who don’t have resources to pay for SAA courses to supplement what they learn in graduate school.

What cartoon character do you model yourself after?

This is a hard question. I’ll go with Eliza Thornberry because she’s a smart kid, and I also wish I could talk to my cat.

Meet the 2018 Candidates: Susan Malsbury

The 2018 elections for Electronic Records Section leadership are upon us! To support your getting to know the candidates, we will be presenting additional information provided by the 2018 nominees for ERS leadership positions. For more information about the slate of candidates, you can check out the full 2018 ERS elections site. ERS Members: be sure to vote! Polls are open through July 17!

Candidate name: Susan Malsbury

Running for: Vice-Chair / Chair-Elect

What made you want to become an archivist?

When I was initially applying to library schools, I wanted to be sure that I was choosing the right career path. To that end, I volunteered at the Portland Public Library and the Maine Historical Society, both in Portland, Maine. While I enjoyed my time at the public library, I immediately fell in love with the archival work at the historical society. My project there was helping an archivist process the Portland Press Herald glass plate negative collection and scan select negatives for inclusion in the Maine Memory Network. It was magic seeing all these early-20th century images unwrapped from their cracked, yellowed envelopes and reintroduced to the world after so many years via description and scanning. It was extremely fulfilling to help preserve the negatives for future researchers. I returned to New York City and was fortunate enough to get a job in the Manuscripts and Archives Division at the New York Public Library. I was able to supplement my graduate work with hands-on experience processing some truly incredible collections such as the 1939/1940 New York World’s Fair papers and the Truman Capote papers. While digital archives are a far cry from glass plate negatives, I feel a similar fulfillment knowing that I’m helping ensure the preservation and future accessibility of unique born-digital records.

What is one thing you’d like to see the Electronic Records Section accomplish during your time on the steering committee?

There are a lot of exciting initiatives, programs, and ad hoc groups developing in the digital archives and digital preservation communities. I would love for ERS to build on its mandate to be the locus of expertise for SAA by serving as a platform for these projects to reach SAA’s general membership. Additionally, I’d like to work to expand participation as an ever-greater number of archivists are working with born-digital material (even if “digital” isn’t in their job title).

What cartoon character do you model yourself after?

As a child of the ‘90s I’ve always strongly identified with Lisa Simpson.

Building Community for Archivematica

By Shira Peltzman, Nick Krabbenhoeft and Max Eckard


In March of 2018, the Archivematica User Forum held the first in an ongoing series of bi-monthly calls for active Archivematica users or stakeholders. Archivematica users (40 total!) from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom came together to share project updates and ongoing challenges and begin to work with their peers to identify and define community solutions.

Purpose

The Archivematica user community is large (and growing!), but formal communication channels between Archivematica users are limited. While the Archivematica Google Group is extremely valuable, it has some drawbacks. Artefactual prioritizes their paid support and training services there, and posts seem to focus primarily on announcing new releases or resolving errors. This sets an expectation that communication flows there from Artefactual to Archivematica users, rather than between Archivematica users. Likewise, Archivematica Camps are an exciting development, but at the moment these occur relatively infrequently and require participants to travel. As a result, it can be hard for Archivematica users to find partners and share work.

Enter the Archivematica User Forum. We hope these calls will fill this peer-to-peer communication void! Our goal is to create a space for discussion that will enable practitioners to connect with one another and identify common denominators, issues, and roadblocks that affect users across different organizations. In short, we are hoping that these calls will provide a broader and more dynamic forum for user engagement and support, and ultimately foster a more cohesive and robust user community.

Genesis

The User Forum is not the first group created to connect Archivematica users. Several regional groups already exist; the Texas Archivematica Users Groups and UK Archivematica Users Group (blog of their latest meeting) are amazing communities that meet regularly. But sometimes, the people trying to adapt, customize, and improve Archivematica the same way you are live in a different time zone.

That situation inspired the creation of this group. After realizing how often relationships would form because someone knew someone who knew someone doing something similar, creating a national forum where everyone had the chance to meet everyone else seemed like the natural choice.

Scope

It takes a lot to build a new community, so we have tried to keep the commitment light. To start with, the forum meets every two months. Second, it’s open to anyone using Archivematica that can make the call, 9AM on the West Coast, 12PM on the East Coast. That includes archivists, technologists, developers and any other experts actively using or experimenting with Archivematica.

Third, we have some in-scope and out-of-scope topics. In-scope includes anything that helps us continue to improve our usage of Archivematica: project announcements, bug tracking/diagnosis, desired features, recurring problems or concerns, documentation, checking-in on Archivematica implementations, and identifying other users that make use of the same features. Out-of-scope includes topics about getting started with digital preservation or Archivematica. Those are incredibly important topics, but an over commitment for this group.

Finally, we don’t have any official relationship with Artefactual Systems. We want to develop a user-led community that can identify areas for improvements and contribute to the long-term development of Archivematica. Part of the development is finding our voice as a community.

Current Activity

As of this blog post, the Archivematica Users Forum is two calls in. We’ve discussed project announcements, bug tracking/diagnosis, recurring problems or concerns, desired features (including this Features Request spreadsheet), local customizations and identifying other users that make use of the same features.

We spent a good deal of time during our first meeting on March 1, 2018 gathering and ranking topics that participants wanted to discuss during these calls, and intend to cover them in future calls. These topics, in order of interest, include:

Topic Number of Up-votes
Processing large AIPs (size and number of files) 12
Discussing reporting features, workflows, and code 10
How ingest is being tracked and QA’ed, both within and without Archivematica 9
Automation tools – how are people using them, issues folks are running into, etc. 7
How to manage multi-user installations and pipelines 7
Types of pipelines/workflows 7
Having more granularity in turning micro-services on and off 6
Troubleshooting the AIC functionality 3
What other types of systems people are using with Archivematica – DPN, etc. 3
Are people doing development work outside of Artefactual contracts? 2
How to add new micro-services 2
How to customize the FPR, how to manage and migrate customizations 2
How system architectures impact the throughput of Archivematica (large files, large numbers of files, backup schedules) 1

As you can see, there’s no shortage of potential topics! During that meeting, participants shared a number of development announcements:

  • dataverse Integration as a data source (Scholars Portal);
  • DIP creator for software/complex digital objects via Automation Tools (CCA);
  • reporting – development project to report on file format info via API queries (UCLA/NYPL);
  • turning off indexing to increase pipeline speed (Columbia);
  • micro-service added to post identifier to ArchivesSpace (UH); and
  • micro-service added to write README file to AIP (Denver Art Museum).

During our second meeting on May 3, 2018, we discussed types of pipelines/workflows as well as well as how folks decided to adopt another pipeline versus having multiple processing configurations or Storage Service locations. We heard from a number of institutions:

  • NYPL: Uses multiple pipelines – one is for disk images exclusively (they save all disk images even if they don’t end up in the finding aid) and the other is for packages of files associated to finding aid components. They are considering a third pipeline for born-digital video material. Their decision point on adopting a new pipeline is whether different workflows might require different format policies, and therefore different FPRs.
  • RAC: Uses multiple pipelines for digitization, AV, and born-digital archival transfers. Their decision point is based on amount of processing power required for different types of material.
  • Bentley: Uses one pipeline where processing archivists arrange and describe. They are considering a new pipeline with a more streamlined approach to packaging, and are curious when multiple configurations in a single pipeline is warranted versus creating multiple pipelines.
  • Kansas State: Uses two pipelines – one for digitization (images and text) and a second pipeline for special collections material (requires processing).
  • University of Houston: Uses two pipelines – one pipeline for digitization and a second pipeline for born-digital special collections.
  • UT San Antonio: Uses multiple configurations instead of multiple pipeline.

During that call, we also began to discuss the topic of how people deal with large transfers (size or number of files).

Next Call and Future Plans!

We hope you will consider joining us during our next call on July 5, 2018 at 12pm EDT / 9am PDT or at future bi-monthly calls, which are held on the first Thursday of every other month. Call in details are below!

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android:
https://ucla.zoom.us/j/854186191

  • iPhone one-tap (US): +16699006833,854186191# or +16465588656,854186191#
  • Telephone (US): +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656
  • Meeting ID: 854 186 191

International numbers available: https://ucla.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=EYLpz4l8KdqWrLdoSAbf5AVRwxXt7OHo


Shira Peltzman is the Digital Archivist at the University of California, Los Angeles Library.

Nick Krabbenhoeft is the Head of Digital Preservation at the New York Public Library.

Max Eckard is the Lead Archivist for Digital Initiatives at the Bentley Historical Library.

 

Call for Contributions: Script It!

Scripting and working in the command line have become increasingly important skills for archivists, particularly for those who work with digital materials — at the same time, approaching these tools as a beginner can be intimidating. This series hopes to help break down barriers by allowing archivists to learn from their peers. We want to hear about how you use or are learning to use scripts (Bash, Python, Ruby, etc.) or the command line (one-liners, a favorite command line tool) in your day-to-day work, how scripts play into your processes and workflows, and how you are developing your knowledge in this area. How has this changed the way you think about your work? How has this changed your relationship with your colleagues or other stakeholders?

We’re particularly interested in posts that consist of a walk-through of a simple script (or one-liner) used in your digital archives workflow. Show us your script or command and tell us how it works.

A few other potential topics and themes for posts:

  • Stories of success or failure with scripting for digital archives
  • General “tips and tricks” for the command line/scripting
  • Independent or collaborative learning strategies for developing “tech” skills
  • A round-up of resources about a particular scripting language or related topic
  • Applying computational thinking to digital archives

Writing for bloggERS! “Script It!” Series

  • We encourage visual representations: Posts can include or largely consist of comics, flowcharts, a series of memes, etc!
  • Written content should be roughly 600-800 words in length
  • Write posts for a wide audience: anyone who stewards, studies, or has an interest in digital archives and electronic records, both within and beyond SAA
  • Align with other editorial guidelines as outlined in the bloggERS! guidelines for writers.

Posts for this series will start in July, so let us know if you are interested in contributing by sending an email to ers.mailer.blog@gmail.com!

A Day in Review: Personal Digital Archiving Conference Recap

by Valencia Johnson

The Personal Digital Archiving conference, which took place April 23-25, 2018, was hosted by the University of Houston. The conference was a mixture of archival professionals, librarians, entrepreneurs, and self-taught memory workers.  The recurrent theme this year, from the perspective of a newcomer at least, was personal digitization. Each demographic offered battle-tested advice for digitization and digital preservation. From these personal testimonies several questions occurred to me and other conference attendees. How is the digital world transforming memory and identity? How can the archival community improve the accessibility of tools and knowledge necessary to create and manage digital cultural heritage? What does it look like when we work with people instead of working for people? If these questions trigger a post-modernism bell in your mind, then you are on the right path.

Each presentation touched upon the need within communities to preserve their history for one reason or another. The residents of Houston are in some ways still recovering from Hurricane Harvey; institutions and homes were flooded, and pictures and home videos were lost to the gulf. Yet, through this disaster the Houston community is finding ways to rebuild and recapture a small piece of what was lost. Lisa Spiro opened the first day of the conference with her presentation “Creating a Community-Driven Digital Archive: The Harvey Memories Project.” This archive aims to document the experience of the survivors of Harvey and offer an additional personal narrative to the official record of the disaster. Expected to launch in August 2018, the first anniversary of  Hurricane Harvey, the project is built by community members and something to keep an eye out for.

The following session was comprised of multiple presenters diving into community archives. Presentations covered how researchers Ana Roeschley’s and Jeonghun (Annie) Kim’s project about a memory roadshow in Massachusetts is uncovering the complex nature of human memory and attachment; Sandra Wang’s quest to preserve her family history by travelling to China and interviewing her grandfather about topics like shame and self-doubt; and Lisa Cruces’s work with Houston Archives Collective, an organization that educates and supports efforts of the community to preserve their history for themselves. Finally, all the way from Alaska, Siri Tuttle and Susan Paskuan discussed the Eliza Jones’ Collection, a true collaboration between an institution and a community to preserve and use material vital to interior Alaskan native communities.

This is a slide from Scott Carlson’s presentation “Megaton Goes Boom: Archiving and Preserving My Father’s First Comic Book,” 25 April 2018.

Later that day were lightning talks about tools useful in the digital age. For example, did you know you can save voicemails? I did not, but thanks to Lucy Rosenbloom’s presentation, I know iPhone users are able to save the voicemails by clicking the square box with the up arrow and emailing the message as a .mp4. Here is a link to a useful article about saving voicemail. Rosenbloom converts her .mp4s into .mp3s and she also uses an auto transcription tool to create transcripts of her messages. The day winded down with personal tales of archiving family history solo and on a budget from Leslie Wagner and Scott Carlson respectively. For more information about the tools and projects discussed at the conference, please visit the program.


Valencia L. Johnson is the Project Archivist for Student Life for the Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript Library at Princeton University. She is a certified archivist with an MA in Museum Studies from Baylor University.

Welcome to the World of Tomorrow: Technology that should give archivists nightmares (or at least indigestion)

by Joshua Kitchens

Advances in technology should not be looked as so much as forward progress, but as a series  of more complicated things for use to preserve. This complicated reality that we as archivists will be facing. For just a moment, instead of considering the present or looking or backwards, let us look towards the bright and shiny tomorrow.

Quantum Computing

Quantum computing seems like a real thing. There were some doubts early on about whether or not the quantum computers that existed were real, but that sort of fits the whole definition of theoretical physics. Now it seems that qubits are the new bits. With Google and other tech companies leading the efforts to build machines that can calculate seemingly impossible things, and with speeds unheard of by today’s standards, say goodbye to simple 1’s and 0’s and hello to 1 and 0’s in superpositions and entangled, quantumly speaking. What kinds of records will these machines create? <Shrugs> It is impossible to know just yet, but they are coming, and we should be aware. Unfortunately, I doubt Al will be there to help us figure out where our leap into this new realm of computing has landed us.

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality

Nothing quite gets my head spinning like thinking about how to deal with the inevitable virtual reality take over. While we may get to luxuriate in digital evergreen fields with elves, orcs, and cyberspace marines, I can only expect the enviable need to find a way to preserve these New Aged sprites, as I can only imagine that in the future a peace treaties will be worked out between a 7-foot-tall virtual anthropomorphic moose and an overly cute chibi panda. While further historians will debate the meaning of 🙂 in the third line of that treaty, we will need to understand the significant properties and other aspects that should be preserved and what could be said of the record qualities of these virtual spaces. What sorts of technological preservation will be required for these environments? Will we feel an overwhelming sense of dread as we appraise these records? Think about the headset graveyard!!! We should also consider augmented reality. Augmented reality poses a complex issue. What is the record, in this case: the Google Glass overlay onto the real world, or the data behind the overlay? I feel a bit like we are Morpheus searching for our Neo in this case. Will you be the One?

Video Games

In many respects, video games could be included in any discussion of virtual worlds, but for now, let’s take Mario head on, or shall we say feet first. Like virtual reality, video games are complex digital objects, but in addition to a game with systems for rendering pixels and dynamic worlds, there is usually a rabid and supporting fan base. These are primarily cultural spaces, sometimes based on game, like World of Warcraft and Eve Online, and sometimes existing through forums and twitter hashtags. These groups introduce new  language, like “ult” or ultimate. They debate issues going beyond the game environment. Problems range from ethics to Trans rights, to much more. So for video games, part of understanding  the complex record that is a game, is the various communities that have been created around them.

Blockchain

Blockchain is the new buzz word on the internet and business these days. What started out as principally a vehicle and system for recording transactions of a currency unfettered from governmental controls has blossomed into a buzzword fueled explosion of… well, I’m not entirely sure. What I do know is that graphics cards are prohibitively expensive now, and Kodak has licensed its name to a bitcoin mining company. Kodak has also allowed its name to be used for a company that wants to use blockchains to help track image rights. This is quite a development. Some researchers, such as Hrvoje Stancic, are already thinking about the implications of blockchains for archives and information professionals. So get ready, you might need your hacker specs for this one.

Diving into Computational Archival Science

by Jane Kelly

In December 2017, the IEEE Big Data conference came to Boston, and with it came the second annual computational archival science workshop! Workshop participants were generous enough to come share their work with the local library and archives community during a one-day public unconference held at the Harvard Law School. After some sessions from Harvard librarians that touched on how they use computational methods to explore archival collections, the unconference continued with lightning talks from CAS workshop participants and discussions about what participants need to learn to engage with computational archival science in the future.

So, what is computational archival science? It is defined by CAS scholars as:

“An interdisciplinary field concerned with the application of computational methods and resources to large-scale records/archives processing, analysis, storage, long-term preservation, and access, with aim of improving efficiency, productivity and precision in support of appraisal, arrangement and description, preservation and access decisions, and engaging and undertaking research with archival material.”

Lightning round (and they really did strike like a dozen 90-second bolts of lightning, I promise!) talks from CAS workshop participants ranged from computational curation of digitized records to blockchain to topic modeling for born-digital collections. Following a voting session, participants broke into two rounds of large group discussions to dig deeper into lightning round topics. These discussions considered natural language processing, computational curation of cultural heritage archives, blockchain, and computational finding aids. Slides from lightning round presenters and community notes can be found on the CAS Unconference website.

Lightning round talks. (Image credit)

 

What did we learn? (What questions do we have now?)

Beyond learning a bit about specific projects that leverage computational methods to explore archival material, we discussed some of the challenges that archivists may bump up against when they want to engage with this work. More questions were raised than answered, but the questions can help us build a solid foundation for future study.

First, and for some of us in attendance perhaps the most important point, is the need to familiarize ourselves with computational methods. Do we have the specific technical knowledge to understand what it really means to say we want to use topic modeling to describe digital records? If not, how can we build our skills with community support? Are our electronic records suitable for computational processes? How might these issues change the way we need to conceptualize or approach appraisal, processing, and access to electronic records?

Many conversations repeatedly turned to issues of bias, privacy, and ethical issues. How do our biases shape the tools we build and use? What skills do we need to develop in order to recognize and dismantle biases in technology?

Word cloud from the unconference created by event co-organizer Ceilyn Boyd.

 

What do we need?

The unconference was intended to provide a space to bring more voices into conversations about computational methods in archives and, more specifically, to connect those currently engaged in CAS with other library and archives practitioners. At the end of the day, we worked together to compile a list of things that we felt many of us would need to learn in order to engage with CAS.

These needs include lists of methodologies and existing tools, canonical data and/or open datasets to use in testing such tools, a robust community of practice, postmortem analysis of current/existing projects, and much more. Building a community of practice and skill development for folks without strong programming skills was identified as both particularly important and especially challenging.

Be sure to check out some of the lightning round slides and community notes to learn more about CAS as a field as well as specific projects!

Interested in connecting with the CAS community? Join the CAS Google Group at: computational-archival-science@googlegroups.com!

The Harvard CAS unconference was planned and administered by Ceilyn Boyd, Jane Kelly, and Jessica Farrell of Harvard Library, with help from Richard Marciano and Bill Underwood from the Digital Curation Innovation Center (DCIC) at the University of Maryland’s iSchool. Many thanks to all the organizers, presenters, and participants!


Jane Kelly is the Historical & Special Collections Assistant at the Harvard Law School Library. She will complete her MSLIS from the iSchool at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in December 2018.