The editors at bloggERS! HQ are looking for authors to write for a new series of posts, and we’d like to hear from YOU.
The topic of the next series on the Electronic Records Section blog is processing digital materials: what it is, how practitioners are doing it, and how they are measuring their work.
How are you processing digital materials? And how do you define “digital processing,” anyway?
The what and how of digital processing are dependent upon a variety of factors: available resources and technical expertise, the tools, systems, and infrastructure that are particular to an organization, and the nature of the digital materials themselves.
- What tools are you using, and how do they integrate with your physical arrangement and description practices?
- Are you leveraging automation, topic modeling, text analysis, named entity recognition, or other technologies in your processing workflows?
- How are you working with different types of digital content, such as email, websites, documents, and digital images?
- What are the biggest challenges that you have encountered? What is your biggest recent digital processing success? What would you like to be able to do, and what are your blockers?
If you have answers to any of these questions, or you are thinking of other questions we haven’t asked here, then consider writing a post to share your experiences (good or bad) processing digital materials.
Quantifying and tracking digital processing activities
Many organizations maintain processing metrics, such as hours per linear foot. In processing digital materials, the level of effort may be more dependent upon the type and format of the materials than their extent.
- What metrics make sense for quantifying digital processing activities?
- How does your organization track the pace and efficiency of digital processing activities?
- Have you explored any alternative ways of documenting digital processing activity?
If you have been working to answer any of these questions for yourself or your institution, we’d like to hear from you!
Writing for bloggERS!
- Posts should be between 200-600 words in length
- Posts can take many forms: instructional guides, in-depth tool exploration, surveys, dialogues, point-counterpoint debates are all welcome!
- Write posts for a wide audience: anyone who stewards, studies, or has an interest in digital archives and electronic records, both within and beyond SAA
- Align with other editorial guidelines as outlined in the bloggERS! guidelines for writers.
Posts for this series will start in early April, so let us know ASAP if you are interested in contributing by sending an email to email@example.com!