By Jessica Meyerson and Zach Vowell
This post is the first in our series on the Software Preservation Network 2016 Forum.
The Software Preservation Network (SPN) 2016 Forum was held Monday, August 1st, 2016 on the Georgia State University campus in downtown Atlanta, Georgia. The SPN 2016 Forum theme, “Action Research: Empowering the Cultural Heritage Community and Mapping Out Next Steps for Software Preservation” reflected the mission of the Software Preservation Network (SPN) — to solicit community input and build consensus around next steps for preserving software at scale as part of the larger effort to ensure long-term access to digital objects. Over the next few weeks, bloggERS will be publishing a series of posts about the Forum, written by attendees. This blog post series speaks to the core beliefs of the Software Preservation Network team:
- Reflection is essential to our practice. Our Volunteer Blog Post Authors represent a team of Reflective Practitioners — helping us to derive and articulate insights from their embodied experience as Forum attendees and participants.
- The practice of critical reflection around software preservation must incorporate members from complementary domains to actively participate in a coordinated effort to develop a sustainable, national strategy for proprietary software licensing and collection — pulling heavily from the collective, embodied experience and expertise of researcher-practitioners in law, archives, libraries, museums, software development and other domains.
Community participation was key to the Forum’s success and proposals were invited on topics including:
- Current collaborations/consortial efforts
- Collective software licensing approaches
- Preservation efforts
- Emulated or virtualized access options
- Organizational structures that have worked for other multi-institutional initiatives that may work for software preservation
Our call for proposals received an enthusiastic response — so much so, that we embarked on a happy experiment to push the conversation forward, and closer to actionable next steps. We asked our participants to scrap their original proposal and work together in teams to identify overlaps/intersections across projects AND design an activity to facilitate meaningful engagement among attendees. They all said yes — to ambiguity, to experimentation, and to dedicating more of their time and energy towards making the Forum a valuable experience. The final Forum schedule can be found here, but for a preview of what you’ll be hearing about over the course of this blog post series, below is a list of sessions and their participants:
ICE BREAKER ACTIVITY
SESSION 1 – Legal and Policy Aspects of Software Preservation
- Henry Lowood – Stanford University
- Zach Vowell – Software Preservation Network
SESSION 2 – Current Collecting, Processing of and Access to Legacy Software
- Glynn Edwards – Stanford University
- Jason Scott – Internet Archive
- Doug White – National Software Reference Library
- Paula Jabloner – Computer History Museum
SESSION 3 – Research and Data on Software Preservation
- Micah Altman – Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Jessica Meyerson & Zach Vowell – Software Preservation Network
SESSION 4 – Partnerships Forming Around Software Preservation
- Aliza Leventhal – Sasaki Associates
- Tim Walsh – Canadian Centre for Architecture
- Nicholas Taylor – Stanford University
- Ryder Kouba – The American University in Cairo
SESSION 5 – Community Roadmapping
As you read the posts in this series, if you are inspired to get involved with this growing community of dedicated colleagues, there are several ways to dive in:
- Submit a use case. We ask, for the sake of easier analysis/comparison (finding common themes across use cases) that you follow this general structure.
- We are scheduled to send out a version of our software preservation community roadmap on these listservs — please let us know if there are other groups of folks that might be interested.
- Sign up to participate in the working groups that have been formed around the community roadmap.
Zach Vowell has worked with born-digital collection material since 2007, and has served as Digital Archivist at at the Robert E. Kennedy Library, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo since 2013. At Cal Poly, he is co-primary investigator of the IMLS-funded Software Preservation Network project, and leads digital preservation efforts within Kennedy Library’s Special Collections. Zach has long recognized the need to strategically preserve software in order to provide long-term access to archival collections.
Jessica Meyerson is Digital Archivist at the Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas in Austin, where she is responsible for building infrastructure to support digital preservation and access. Jessica earned her M.S.I.S. from the University of Texas at Austin with specializations in digital archives and preservation. She is Co-PI on the IMLS-funded Software Preservation Network – a role that allows her to promote the essential role of software preservation in responsible and effective digital stewardship.